Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 19(3): 210-215, July-Sept/2015. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-753998

ABSTRACT

Introduction Periodic follow-up appointments are important to ensure long-term effectiveness of rehabilitation with hearing aids. However, not all users are able to maintain adherence to recommendations prescribed during the fitting process and some do not attend those appointments, which compromises the effectiveness of treatment. Objective Compare hearing aid use after 1 year between subjects who did not attend a follow-up evaluation appointment at a publicly-funded health service (nonattenders) and those who attended the appointment (attenders). Reasons for nonuse of hearing aids and unscheduled appointments were also analyzed. Methods Prospective observational cross-sectional study. Nonattenders and attenders in a follow-up evaluation appointment were interviewed by telephone about hearing aid use, reasons for nonuse, and unscheduled appointments. Results The nonattenders group consisted of 108 subjects and the attenders group had 200 subjects; in both groups, most users kept bilateral use but the nonuse rate was higher in nonattenders. The main reason for nonuse of hearing aids among nonattenders was health problems; fitting problems was the main reason for nonuse in the attenders group. Health problems and issues like unavailable companion and transportation difficulties were the reasons for unscheduled follow-up appointments. Conclusion Nonattenders had a greater nonuse rate and were more likely to abandon hearing aid use. Measures to increase hearing aid use and adherence to prescribed recommendations are also necessary to ensure long-termeffectiveness of rehabilitation with hearing aids.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hearing Aids , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Deafness/rehabilitation , Brazil
2.
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health ; 2006 Jul; 37(4): 622-9
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-35889

ABSTRACT

The major religion in Lao PDR is Buddhism, but many ethnic groups in rural Lao PDR hold an animist belief system called "Sadsana-pee". At the same time, the Bourapar District study site in Khammouane Province, Lao PDR is at high risk of malaria infection. Due to their belief in traditional ways of healing, the promotion of malaria prevention and treatment with modern medicine was not always welcomed by the villagers. Based on the results of questionnaire interviews with 240 heads of households from February to March of 2003, the effect of local beliefs on malaria control activities was discussed. Despite widely available western medicine and widely conducted health education, some people still believe that evil spirits cause malaria and rely on traditional medicine and/or religious ceremonies for treatment. Based on our findings, we recommend that future education and malaria control programs be revised and made sensitive to those people holding indigenous beliefs.


Subject(s)
Adult , Attitude to Health/ethnology , Ethnicity/psychology , Family Characteristics , Humans , Laos , Malaria/ethnology , Medicine, East Asian Traditional , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Religion and Medicine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL